Skip to main content

Performance improvement with StringBuilder class

Often we do large string concatenation in our code without giving a thought to performance. Consider following example of string concatenation.

string s1 = "orange";
string s2 = "red";

s1 += s2;
System.Console.WriteLine(s1); // outputs "orangered"

s1 = s1.Substring(2, 5);
System.Console.WriteLine(s1); // outputs "anger"

String objects are immutable, meaning that they cannot be changed once they have been created. Methods that act on strings actually return new string objects. In the previous example, when the contents of s1 and s2 are concatenated to form a single string, the two strings containing "orange" and "red" are both unmodified. The += operator creates a new string that contains the combined contents. The result is that s1 now refers to a different string altogether. A string containing just "orange" still exists, but is no longer referenced when s1 is concatenated.

Therefore, for performance reasons, large amounts of concatenation or other involved string manipulation should be performed with the StringBuilder class, like this:

System.Text.StringBuilder sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder();
sb.Append("one ");
sb.Append("two ");
sb.Append("three");
string str = sb.ToString();

The StringBuilder class creates a string buffer that offers better performance if your program performs a lot of string manipulation. The StringBuilder string also allows you to reassign individual characters, something the built-in string data type does not support. This code, for example, changes the content of a string without creating a new string:

System.Text.StringBuilder sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder("Rat: the ideal pet");
sb[0] = 'C';
System.Console.WriteLine(sb.ToString());
System.Console.ReadLine();

class TestStringBuilder
{
static void Main()
{
System.Text.StringBuilder sb = new System.Text.StringBuilder();

// Create a string composed of numbers 0 - 9
for (int i = 0; i <>
{
sb.Append(i.ToString());
}
System.Console.WriteLine(sb); // displays 0123456789

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Searching Unicode characters in Oracle table

Oracle implementation of Regular expression has no support for using hexadecimal code to search for Unicode characters. The only way to search for Unicode character is it use the character itself. Normally with Regular expression, you can use \x or \u followed by hexadecimal code to search for any character. E.g. \x20 will match space. But REGEXP_LIKE in Oracle does not support \x. You need to use unistr function to convert the code to equivalent character and then use it with REGEXP_LIKE. E.g. REGEXP_LIKE(source,'[' ||unistr('\0020')|| ']');

Why there is semicolon at the start of a JavaScript function?

Very often while reviewing the code for my team, I will come across a semicolon at the start of JavaScript function as show below ; (function () { 'use strict'; ...and I often wondered what purpose it served. Guess what. It is an insurance to make sure your script works fine when all other scripts are merged together;  The leading ; in front of immediately-invoked function expressions (iffe) is there to prevent errors when appending the file during concatenation to a file containing an expression not properly terminated with a ;. So there you go. Now you know what that little semicolon is doing there in your code.

C# Performance Improvement - The Power of StringBuilder

 Often when we are wring code we don't think about performance and go with the default options available to achieve a task. String concatenation is one such scenario. If you are doing simple and few string catenations, then you can use the following result = string1 + string2; string1+= string2; result = String.Concat(string1,string2); String.Format and string interpolation are few other options.  However when you are performing large and repetitive  operation, string catenation can be expensive. Here is an example to prove the point.  As you can see it took 41 seconds to perform 100k string catenation. Now lets replace this with StringBuilder and see.  8 ms!!!!!! That is a massive performance difference. Hope you get the point. More info on StringBuilder can be found here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.text.stringbuilder?view=net-7.0