Skip to main content

3 key ingredients for success of Agile

For a team to be successful  at using Agile, following three things are key ingredients

  1. Transparency
  2. Inspection
  3. Adaptation

Transparency...

All things within the Scrum team should be open and visible. Every task and story should be visible not only to Scrum team but also to people outside the team. Kanban board is one example which can be used to show the team progress to everyone. Openness should be highly encouraged with the team. Openness gives the team the courage to highlight any potential issues.Another example is a common definition of 'Done' which is accepted by those performing the work and those accepting the working product.

Inspection...

A team should be able to inspect all scrum artefacts to keep a check on what is working and what is not. Inspection should be performed at regular intervals but not so often that it gets in the way of actual work to accomplish the goal. Ideally inspection should be performed by an external inspector. A good example of inspection would be retrospective performed by a Scrum master from another team. You can perform inspection at sprint planning, daily stand up or at sprint reviews.

Adaptation...

Transparency and inspection helps to identify key things that are going well and more often things that are not going well. If things are not working to teams benefit, the scrum team together decide on how to make it better. Often these could be recorded as lessons learnt at sprint retrospective. The lesson learnt log should be reviewed at each sprint retrospective to make sure mistakes are not being repeated. One example could be task being carried forward to next sprints. A lesson learnt would be to finish all the task in one story before stating next story. 

Adapting is the key to success of Agile. Things change and often they are beyond our control. For example, team members leave or are off sick or the business requirement changed because of a change in market condition which is beyond our control. In such cases, the whole team collectively make a decision on how to adapt to this sudden change and keep the focus on delivering business value.

Hope this short article has given you enough ingredients to implement a successful Agile process in your team. Pleas drop a comment if you have any queries or concerns.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Searching Unicode characters in Oracle table

Oracle implementation of Regular expression has no support for using hexadecimal code to search for Unicode characters. The only way to search for Unicode character is it use the character itself. Normally with Regular expression, you can use \x or \u followed by hexadecimal code to search for any character. E.g. \x20 will match space. But REGEXP_LIKE in Oracle does not support \x. You need to use unistr function to convert the code to equivalent character and then use it with REGEXP_LIKE. E.g. REGEXP_LIKE(source,'[' ||unistr('\0020')|| ']');

Why there is semicolon at the start of a JavaScript function?

Very often while reviewing the code for my team, I will come across a semicolon at the start of JavaScript function as show below ; (function () { 'use strict'; ...and I often wondered what purpose it served. Guess what. It is an insurance to make sure your script works fine when all other scripts are merged together;  The leading ; in front of immediately-invoked function expressions (iffe) is there to prevent errors when appending the file during concatenation to a file containing an expression not properly terminated with a ;. So there you go. Now you know what that little semicolon is doing there in your code.

C# Performance Improvement - The Power of StringBuilder

 Often when we are wring code we don't think about performance and go with the default options available to achieve a task. String concatenation is one such scenario. If you are doing simple and few string catenations, then you can use the following result = string1 + string2; string1+= string2; result = String.Concat(string1,string2); String.Format and string interpolation are few other options.  However when you are performing large and repetitive  operation, string catenation can be expensive. Here is an example to prove the point.  As you can see it took 41 seconds to perform 100k string catenation. Now lets replace this with StringBuilder and see.  8 ms!!!!!! That is a massive performance difference. Hope you get the point. More info on StringBuilder can be found here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.text.stringbuilder?view=net-7.0