Skip to main content

Closure and Captured variables

Here is a sample code. Can you guess what the output would be ?

 
public static class TasksExample { public static void Execute() { Task[] tasks = new Task[10]; for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { tasks[i] = Task.Run(() => CalculateResult(i)); } Task.WaitAll(tasks); //ask.Wait(); //Console.WriteLine(tasks[i].Result); Console.WriteLine("Next work..."); } public static int CalculateResult(int i) { Console.WriteLine($"work starting {i}"); Thread.Sleep(10000); Console.WriteLine($"Completed work {i}"); return 100; } }
Pat yourself if your answer was like this
work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 work starting 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Completed work 10 Next work...
so why is this? For loop is iterating nicely but why did all the tasks got value 10? The answer lies in Closure and Captured variable. The scope of i is in for loop. When you pass the variable to an anonymous function, it wont use the value until the function is executed. In this case it is after the for loop has exited and now the value of i is 10. Hence when Task executes CalculateResult, all tasks now will have value 10. Awesome!!!

If you are using Resharper, it will give you a warning "Access to modified closure". I can't explain it better than here https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/AccessToModifiedClosure.html

So the solution to above issue is to copy the value of i to a local variable with the loop as shown here

public static class TasksExample { public static void Execute() { Task[] tasks = new Task[10]; for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { var i1 = i; tasks[i] = Task.Run(() => CalculateResult(i1)); } Task.WaitAll(tasks); //ask.Wait(); //Console.WriteLine(tasks[i].Result); Console.WriteLine("Next work..."); } public static int CalculateResult(int i) { Console.WriteLine($"work starting {i}"); Thread.Sleep(10000); Console.WriteLine($"Completed work {i}"); return 100; } }

and now you get the correct result
work starting 1 work starting 0 work starting 2 work starting 3 work starting 4 work starting 5 work starting 6 work starting 7 work starting 8 work starting 9 Completed work 1 Completed work 2 Completed work 3 Completed work 0 Completed work 5 Completed work 4 Completed work 6 Completed work 7 Completed work 8 Completed work 9 Next work...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Searching Unicode characters in Oracle table

Oracle implementation of Regular expression has no support for using hexadecimal code to search for Unicode characters. The only way to search for Unicode character is it use the character itself. Normally with Regular expression, you can use \x or \u followed by hexadecimal code to search for any character. E.g. \x20 will match space. But REGEXP_LIKE in Oracle does not support \x. You need to use unistr function to convert the code to equivalent character and then use it with REGEXP_LIKE. E.g. REGEXP_LIKE(source,'[' ||unistr('\0020')|| ']');

Why there is semicolon at the start of a JavaScript function?

Very often while reviewing the code for my team, I will come across a semicolon at the start of JavaScript function as show below ; (function () { 'use strict'; ...and I often wondered what purpose it served. Guess what. It is an insurance to make sure your script works fine when all other scripts are merged together;  The leading ; in front of immediately-invoked function expressions (iffe) is there to prevent errors when appending the file during concatenation to a file containing an expression not properly terminated with a ;. So there you go. Now you know what that little semicolon is doing there in your code.

C# Performance Improvement - The Power of StringBuilder

 Often when we are wring code we don't think about performance and go with the default options available to achieve a task. String concatenation is one such scenario. If you are doing simple and few string catenations, then you can use the following result = string1 + string2; string1+= string2; result = String.Concat(string1,string2); String.Format and string interpolation are few other options.  However when you are performing large and repetitive  operation, string catenation can be expensive. Here is an example to prove the point.  As you can see it took 41 seconds to perform 100k string catenation. Now lets replace this with StringBuilder and see.  8 ms!!!!!! That is a massive performance difference. Hope you get the point. More info on StringBuilder can be found here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.text.stringbuilder?view=net-7.0